Play Time

A lot of people who know that our third and FINAL offspring is also our only male child have asked how I and my husband are handling the “boy” stuff. I’m assuming they’re not talking about the logistics on how I physically handle the fact that my baby has a penis.

They are, in fact, wondering how we’re  handling all those DIFFERENCES.

When my usual blank stare doesn’t clue them in, I just tell them that we have noticed no difference at this stage. Because, for fuck’s sake, he’s 6 months old. What I wish they asked me was how my husband and I intend to make all three of our kids into really awesome people of substance. But they never ask me that. *snf*

Yes, those differences. I’ve actually been thinking about it a lot– like since I became a parent. I’m fascinated with the idea of gender-specific play. But more than that, I want to get ready for the ensuing battle. My kids are going to public school with the children of traditional families. They won’t be spending a majority of their play time with the children whose parents I hand-picked for being awesome, open-minded, LGBT-friendly people.  I want to parent my kids in such a way that they are less liable to fall into those adolescent patterns of behavior where they segregate by gender and take on some of what I see as the more noxious of peer-driven behaviors: exclusion, teasing, bullying.

I see the playground at my kids’ school as THE PLACE WHERE IT ALL BEGINS! The boy running around pulling down the girls’ pants, the “let’s tease that GIRL for wearing camoflage” behavior — basically, to be quite blunt, the place where sexism and, yes, even our rampant rape culture, starts. In my humble opinion. I want to raise warriors for social justice, people who will BE the change.

I know there has been lots of science committed to figuring out the biochemical reasons there is so-called  “masculine play” and “feminine play” in children — and, although there is evidence that suggests such play is attributable to hormones during fetal development, I think even the words we use in such experiments doom us to failure. What is “masculine” and what is “feminine” anyway? These words are becoming much more nebulous as my world view has changed. It’s not so much black and white in my mind.

I, surprisingly, or not, am no scientist *shock!!* My own interest in the way kids play is more of an interest in watching the effects of society and culture on child’s play. Because I want to raise good people.

We didn’t choose “gender-appropriate” toys when the girls were babies. They didn’t get Barbies and the fucking pink Legos. Their toys were oriented around their interests. So, puzzle books, musical instruments, blocks, dolls, science/experiment kits, Matchbox cars, dress up, books books and more books. We haven’t tried to impose a certain type of play onto them. When Laurel played gleefully with a friend’s kitchen set, we figured that would be a great thing for her. So we acquired one. And she was thrilled. Yay for thoughtful parenting! We try to get them toys and books that speak to the complex bundle of interests that make up their play.

I’m really quite interested in watching that intersection of how the 8 year old plays with other girls than how she plays with boys. I honestly haven’t seen a huge difference in 8 or so years of parenting. The boys who play at our house go for the same things Kelsey does: Lego stuff, Star Wars lightsabers, dolls, and the train set.

It’s interesting to me that when the 6-7 year old girls are playing together, there seem to be more “family” scenarios, where there’s a traditional family unit consisting of mom, dad, baby and sibling. Often I’ll notice that the girls have decided that there are two mommies in the family, and that’s absolutely acceptable in their play. *squeeee!*

When one or both of my girls play with the boys in our community, I notice different motifs, but I can’t be sure if they are attributable to gender or to age, or just a difference in the instruments of play. They pretend to be dragons (but.. still a FAMILY of dragons!) when B comes to play. When M comes over to play, there are sword fights, and the play is more physical. But the girls do these things on their own, too. When J plays, he just wants to join the kids in whatever they’re playing with. He’s very versatile. As are my kids when we go to other people’s houses. They play with what’s available, with whomever will play with them. Sometimes someone doesn’t play fairly. Sometimes, someone gets smacked in the face, either on purpose or accidentally. All of this is within the norm of kid play. We talk it out, apply the band-aids, give a cuddle, make sure everyone is playing fairly with one another. Isn’t that the way it’s supposed to work?

So, now we have this little boy. I can’t wait to get to that point where I can gauge his personality and put interest-appropriate toys in his reach, and help him develop all the different parts of himself through child’s play. The nurturing person, the innovator, the creative type — we are complex animals. Play is that amazing space where we learn about our world, and how we want to interact with it.

What do you think? Do you view child’s play as a neutral gender zone?

This entry was posted in Change, Journal, Photo of the Day. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Jess

    I am not keen on forcing gender roles on kids, either. I know, a shock. Although I expect the nuances of this discussion would be best as a live discussion. :)

  • Sarah

    I think that with the kids I see regularly enough to notice, I've typically heard them start saying things I consider appallingly gendered (like “X is for girls” or “boys don't do Y”) sometime between two and three years old. The kid I see most often is a four-year-old girl who is completely smitten with all things princess, and I admit to deliberately seeking out books about rebellious, smart princesses in order to counteract the usual narrative!

    I also believe that kids vary, though, both in preferences (some girls just like pink, I'd bet) and in how sensitive they are to those social norms and how they react to their perceptions of them. (The part that I think remains vastly unclear is how many girls would like pink if they never got the message “girls like pink.”) I'm curious if your kids say things that sound like they are interacting with social constructs of gender — whether accepting or questioning them! — or if you feel like they just ignore the whole thing :)

  • unalmas

    Child's play is as gender neutral as their parents make it. Your kids – gender-neutral. My kids – gender-neutral. Other kids on the playground – well, not so much.

    I find that keeping things gender neutral is a constant battle. Even with as few “mainstream” friends as Simone has, she frequently tells me things like “black is for men” and “girls can't be firefighters.” It's long hard constant work to keep reminding her that we have male friends that wear skirts and that her female yoga teacher is a firefighter.

  • http://allenholt.com/ Allen

    I love the fact that we at least try to raise our kids in as gender-neutral a way as we can, and the fact that they are usually pretty accepting when point out to them those places where they're inserting gender unnecessarily. I know that battle's going to be harder and harder to fight as they grow up in mainstream public schools, but I think if we've given them the proper grounding, it's a battle we all can win.

    And Sarah: I don't have a definitive answer to your question of whether some girls like pink because they're taught to or because they just do, but at least with Laurel, it's very much a case of “she just does”: we've always fought against the blue-is-for-boys/pink-is-for-girls idea, but she latched onto the color pink pretty early and loves it. (That and orange, frequently together.) I'm sure the mainstream reinforcement of pink-is-for-girls has probably only helped cement that in her head, but she seemed to come to it on her own.

  • Karen Freeman

    (hope you don't mind me jumping in here) I do agree with you that we should make the effort to raise our kids as gender-neutral as possible. However, the reality is that kids are who they are — not empty vessels we can fill with our own ideas. We can illuminate a certain path for them in life — but ultimately, they take their OWN paths.

  • dbang

    “What do you think? Do you view child’s play as a neutral gender zone?”

    Bwahahahahahaha.

    Um. No.

    I'm having trouble envisioning this hypothetical “neutral gender zone”. I think it doesn't exist.

  • dbang

    “Child's play is as gender neutral as their parents make it.”

    How can this be, once the children are old enough to not play in their parents' shadows? I can't “make” my children's play be gender neutral (I can't really “make” it be anything at all…if I could, you can bet it would be quieter and neater!) What am I supposed to do, follow them around with a fly swatter? “Andy, put down that Nerf machine gun, don't you realize how gender normative that is? *THWAP*”

  • mothermirth

    I think that's a very valid insight. They are not vessels. All we can do, all I hope to do, is help introduce them to the fact that leading an examined life is overall more satisfying than one where they tread the same path as everyone before them. I only want them to question those things hammered into their wee little heads via the media, via the philosophy of the playground, via school. Thanks for commenting! You are always welcome here!

  • hermitgeecko

    I'm down with the idea of pink LEGOs… just like I'm down with the idea of green, orange, and purple.

    I'm not down with the idea that girls should get pink LEGOs unless they've shown a definite preference for that color on their own. Sigh.

  • roozle

    So here's what I've seen: keep on providing gender neutral environment in which you BOTH model that girls can be clever and boys can be tender and both genders can wear anything they want. And along the way , the girls will enjoy pink and dolls and the boys will enjoy everything that goes smash and kerboom … but secretly, underneath, they know, rock-solid how MANY choices they really have and their real, adult behavior will reflect that. She says, fingers and toes crossed for good luck.

  • mothermirth

    Perhaps it doesn't! Maybe it's just something some parents are aspiring to, a utopian ideal. I tend to think it exists. It's not a concrete state of being. It's more a fluid movement through behaviors during play and toy preferences and imaginative play.

    I guess what I'm trying to get at here is a discussion on ideology. I'm wondering if other parents promote more of an atmosphere of versatility and tolerance than, let's say our parents' or our own generations? How do you do this? Did you ever?

  • mothermirth

    Beautifully said! Thanks for sharing. It's almost like you have…..experience with this, or something? Yes, choices. Yes, modeling the behavior we hope to see. I like this plan.

  • mothermirth

    This is how we target that female child market. We make them PINK! *punches something*. Thanks for responding!

  • mothermirth

    This is how we target that female child market. We make them PINK! *punches something*. Thanks for responding!

  • http://www.mothermirth.com/archives/beyond-pink-and-blue-on-gender-and-clothing-your-baby/ Beyond Pink and Blue: On Gender and Clothing Your Baby | MotherMirth

    [...] and blue. This problem exists on many levels. I’ve ranted before about Disney princesses and gendered play. But I’ve never had so many people talk to me directly about the issue of clothing until I [...]